County cash rent
Tennessee Farmland Cash Rent: County Rates and Trends
USDA NASS reported 86 Tennessee county cash-rent figures for non-irrigated cropland in 2025. The 2026 state average is USD 118/ac, up USD 3/ac from 2025.
The five highest reported Tennessee counties in 2025 are Robertson (USD 199/ac), Lake (USD 171/ac), Obion (USD 166/ac), Crockett (USD 156/ac), Montgomery (USD 156/ac).
The five lowest reported counties are Claiborne (USD 21/ac), Campbell (USD 22/ac), Hancock (USD 22/ac), Knox (USD 24/ac), Bradley (USD 25/ac), which shows why a statewide average is a weak substitute for county data.
| County or fallback | Year | $/acre | Data level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson | 2025 | USD 28/ac | NASS county figure |
| Bedford | 2025 | USD 84/ac | NASS county figure |
| Benton | 2025 | USD 94/ac | NASS county figure |
| Bledsoe | 2025 | USD 58/ac | NASS county figure |
| Blount | 2025 | USD 56/ac | NASS county figure |
| Bradley | 2025 | USD 25/ac | NASS county figure |
| Campbell | 2025 | USD 22/ac | NASS county figure |
| Cannon | 2025 | USD 98/ac | NASS county figure |
| Carroll | 2025 | USD 135/ac | NASS county figure |
| Carter | 2025 | USD 35/ac | NASS county figure |
| Claiborne | 2025 | USD 21/ac | NASS county figure |
| Clay | 2025 | USD 43/ac | NASS county figure |
| Cocke | 2025 | USD 60/ac | NASS county figure |
| Coffee | 2025 | USD 113/ac | NASS county figure |
| Crockett | 2025 | USD 156/ac | NASS county figure |
| Cumberland | 2025 | USD 65/ac | NASS county figure |
| De Kalb | 2025 | USD 86/ac | NASS county figure |
| Decatur | 2025 | USD 87/ac | NASS county figure |
| Dickson | 2025 | USD 46/ac | NASS county figure |
| Dyer | 2025 | USD 141/ac | NASS county figure |
| Fayette | 2025 | USD 109/ac | NASS county figure |
| Fentress | 2025 | USD 42/ac | NASS county figure |
| Franklin | 2025 | USD 120/ac | NASS county figure |
| Gibson | 2025 | USD 153/ac | NASS county figure |
| Giles | 2025 | USD 79/ac | NASS county figure |
| Grainger | 2025 | USD 36/ac | NASS county figure |
| Greene | 2025 | USD 47/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hamblen | 2025 | USD 61/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hamilton | 2025 | USD 38/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hancock | 2025 | USD 22/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hardeman | 2025 | USD 95/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hardin | 2025 | USD 62/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hawkins | 2025 | USD 25/ac | NASS county figure |
| Haywood | 2025 | USD 153/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hickman | 2025 | USD 47/ac | NASS county figure |
| Houston | 2025 | USD 28/ac | NASS county figure |
| Humphreys | 2025 | USD 76/ac | NASS county figure |
| Jackson | 2025 | USD 54/ac | NASS county figure |
| Jefferson | 2025 | USD 46/ac | NASS county figure |
| Johnson | 2025 | USD 49/ac | NASS county figure |
| Knox | 2025 | USD 24/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lake | 2025 | USD 171/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lauderdale | 2025 | USD 138/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lawrence | 2025 | USD 104/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lewis | 2025 | USD 30/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lincoln | 2025 | USD 97/ac | NASS county figure |
| Loudon | 2025 | USD 55/ac | NASS county figure |
| Macon | 2025 | USD 147/ac | NASS county figure |
| Madison | 2025 | USD 129/ac | NASS county figure |
| Marion | 2025 | USD 58/ac | NASS county figure |
| Maury | 2025 | USD 90/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mcminn | 2025 | USD 65/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mcnairy | 2025 | USD 75/ac | NASS county figure |
| Meigs | 2025 | USD 60/ac | NASS county figure |
| Monroe | 2025 | USD 47/ac | NASS county figure |
| Montgomery | 2025 | USD 156/ac | NASS county figure |
| Moore | 2025 | USD 65/ac | NASS county figure |
| Morgan | 2025 | USD 50/ac | NASS county figure |
| Obion | 2025 | USD 166/ac | NASS county figure |
| Overton | 2025 | USD 53/ac | NASS county figure |
| Perry | 2025 | USD 75/ac | NASS county figure |
| Pickett | 2025 | USD 49/ac | NASS county figure |
| Polk | 2025 | USD 57/ac | NASS county figure |
| Putnam | 2025 | USD 48/ac | NASS county figure |
| Rhea | 2025 | USD 29/ac | NASS county figure |
| Roane | 2025 | USD 29/ac | NASS county figure |
| Robertson | 2025 | USD 199/ac | NASS county figure |
| Rutherford | 2025 | USD 77/ac | NASS county figure |
| Sequatchie | 2025 | USD 49/ac | NASS county figure |
| Sevier | 2025 | USD 41/ac | NASS county figure |
| Shelby | 2025 | USD 120/ac | NASS county figure |
| Smith | 2025 | USD 119/ac | NASS county figure |
| Stewart | 2025 | USD 86/ac | NASS county figure |
| Sullivan | 2025 | USD 39/ac | NASS county figure |
| Sumner | 2025 | USD 148/ac | NASS county figure |
| Tipton | 2025 | USD 154/ac | NASS county figure |
| Trousdale | 2025 | USD 42/ac | NASS county figure |
| Union | 2025 | USD 27/ac | NASS county figure |
| Van Buren | 2025 | USD 26/ac | NASS county figure |
| Warren | 2025 | USD 108/ac | NASS county figure |
| Washington | 2025 | USD 64/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wayne | 2025 | USD 59/ac | NASS county figure |
| Weakley | 2025 | USD 155/ac | NASS county figure |
| White | 2025 | USD 62/ac | NASS county figure |
| Williamson | 2025 | USD 55/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wilson | 2025 | USD 48/ac | NASS county figure |
| Counties not separately reported by NASS | 2026 | USD 118/ac | State-level fallback, not county-specific |
County averages, not medians. The final fallback row shows the Tennessee state figure explicitly labeled as state-level for counties NASS does not separately report.
Five-year Tennessee trend
The 2026 state average is USD 118/ac, up USD 3/ac from 2025. The trend line below uses NASS state rows so it stays stable even when individual county suppression changes year to year.
From county average to parcel read
A county average tells you what surveyed non-irrigated cropland rented for in that county. It does not see whether your acres are high-PI prairie soil, a wet corner, a small irregular field, or ground with better access and drainage than the county average.
Scout reads the parcel's SSURGO soil profile, starts from the county NASS rent when it exists, and applies AgriTerra's PI-based soil band around that benchmark. If the county is unavailable, Scout uses the state figure and labels the downgrade.
Check the parcel, not just the county.
Start with the Tennessee county benchmark, then let Scout read the parcel's soils, acreage, flood, wetlands, CRP fit, and energy context.