County cash rent
Georgia Farmland Cash Rent: County Rates and Trends
USDA NASS reported 91 Georgia county cash-rent figures for non-irrigated cropland in 2025. The 2026 state average is USD 84/ac, up USD 1/ac from 2025.
The five highest reported Georgia counties in 2025 are Colquitt (USD 130/ac), Pulaski (USD 126/ac), Atkinson (USD 120/ac), Mitchell (USD 120/ac), Thomas (USD 119/ac).
The five lowest reported counties are Greene (USD 15/ac), Banks (USD 22/ac), Hancock (USD 22/ac), Haralson (USD 23/ac), Whitfield (USD 23/ac), which shows why a statewide average is a weak substitute for county data.
| County or fallback | Year | $/acre | Data level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appling | 2025 | USD 100/ac | NASS county figure |
| Atkinson | 2025 | USD 120/ac | NASS county figure |
| Bacon | 2025 | USD 74/ac | NASS county figure |
| Baker | 2025 | USD 106/ac | NASS county figure |
| Banks | 2025 | USD 22/ac | NASS county figure |
| Barrow | 2025 | USD 34/ac | NASS county figure |
| Bartow | 2025 | USD 39/ac | NASS county figure |
| Ben Hill | 2025 | USD 107/ac | NASS county figure |
| Berrien | 2025 | USD 94/ac | NASS county figure |
| Bleckley | 2025 | USD 85/ac | NASS county figure |
| Brantley | 2025 | USD 50/ac | NASS county figure |
| Brooks | 2025 | USD 101/ac | NASS county figure |
| Bulloch | 2025 | USD 84/ac | NASS county figure |
| Burke | 2025 | USD 43/ac | NASS county figure |
| Calhoun | 2025 | USD 87/ac | NASS county figure |
| Candler | 2025 | USD 77/ac | NASS county figure |
| Catoosa | 2025 | USD 26/ac | NASS county figure |
| Chattooga | 2025 | USD 46/ac | NASS county figure |
| Clay | 2025 | USD 79/ac | NASS county figure |
| Coffee | 2025 | USD 107/ac | NASS county figure |
| Colquitt | 2025 | USD 130/ac | NASS county figure |
| Columbia | 2025 | USD 26/ac | NASS county figure |
| Cook | 2025 | USD 106/ac | NASS county figure |
| Crisp | 2025 | USD 90/ac | NASS county figure |
| Dawson | 2025 | USD 46/ac | NASS county figure |
| Decatur | 2025 | USD 106/ac | NASS county figure |
| Dodge | 2025 | USD 63/ac | NASS county figure |
| Dooly | 2025 | USD 79/ac | NASS county figure |
| Early | 2025 | USD 92/ac | NASS county figure |
| Effingham | 2025 | USD 36/ac | NASS county figure |
| Elbert | 2025 | USD 38/ac | NASS county figure |
| Emanuel | 2025 | USD 64/ac | NASS county figure |
| Floyd | 2025 | USD 49/ac | NASS county figure |
| Forsyth | 2025 | USD 40/ac | NASS county figure |
| Franklin | 2025 | USD 36/ac | NASS county figure |
| Gilmer | 2025 | USD 35/ac | NASS county figure |
| Gordon | 2025 | USD 38/ac | NASS county figure |
| Grady | 2025 | USD 100/ac | NASS county figure |
| Greene | 2025 | USD 15/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hall | 2025 | USD 35/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hancock | 2025 | USD 22/ac | NASS county figure |
| Haralson | 2025 | USD 23/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hart | 2025 | USD 29/ac | NASS county figure |
| Irwin | 2025 | USD 100/ac | NASS county figure |
| Jeff Davis | 2025 | USD 106/ac | NASS county figure |
| Jefferson | 2025 | USD 35/ac | NASS county figure |
| Jenkins | 2025 | USD 61/ac | NASS county figure |
| Johnson | 2025 | USD 49/ac | NASS county figure |
| Jones | 2025 | USD 25/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lamar | 2025 | USD 30/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lanier | 2025 | USD 78/ac | NASS county figure |
| Laurens | 2025 | USD 44/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lee | 2025 | USD 61/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lowndes | 2025 | USD 96/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lumpkin | 2025 | USD 26/ac | NASS county figure |
| Macon | 2025 | USD 93/ac | NASS county figure |
| Madison | 2025 | USD 37/ac | NASS county figure |
| Marion | 2025 | USD 39/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mcduffie | 2025 | USD 65/ac | NASS county figure |
| Miller | 2025 | USD 100/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mitchell | 2025 | USD 120/ac | NASS county figure |
| Montgomery | 2025 | USD 70/ac | NASS county figure |
| Morgan | 2025 | USD 37/ac | NASS county figure |
| Oconee | 2025 | USD 35/ac | NASS county figure |
| Oglethorpe | 2025 | USD 36/ac | NASS county figure |
| Pike | 2025 | USD 45/ac | NASS county figure |
| Polk | 2025 | USD 46/ac | NASS county figure |
| Pulaski | 2025 | USD 126/ac | NASS county figure |
| Putnam | 2025 | USD 39/ac | NASS county figure |
| Screven | 2025 | USD 50/ac | NASS county figure |
| Seminole | 2025 | USD 102/ac | NASS county figure |
| Stephens | 2025 | USD 31/ac | NASS county figure |
| Tattnall | 2025 | USD 65/ac | NASS county figure |
| Taylor | 2025 | USD 50/ac | NASS county figure |
| Terrell | 2025 | USD 73/ac | NASS county figure |
| Thomas | 2025 | USD 119/ac | NASS county figure |
| Tift | 2025 | USD 111/ac | NASS county figure |
| Toombs | 2025 | USD 72/ac | NASS county figure |
| Treutlen | 2025 | USD 69/ac | NASS county figure |
| Turner | 2025 | USD 98/ac | NASS county figure |
| Union | 2025 | USD 52/ac | NASS county figure |
| Walker | 2025 | USD 38/ac | NASS county figure |
| Walton | 2025 | USD 40/ac | NASS county figure |
| Ware | 2025 | USD 83/ac | NASS county figure |
| Washington | 2025 | USD 50/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wayne | 2025 | USD 81/ac | NASS county figure |
| White | 2025 | USD 46/ac | NASS county figure |
| Whitfield | 2025 | USD 23/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wilcox | 2025 | USD 109/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wilkes | 2025 | USD 25/ac | NASS county figure |
| Worth | 2025 | USD 104/ac | NASS county figure |
| Counties not separately reported by NASS | 2026 | USD 84/ac | State-level fallback, not county-specific |
County averages, not medians. The final fallback row shows the Georgia state figure explicitly labeled as state-level for counties NASS does not separately report.
Five-year Georgia trend
The 2026 state average is USD 84/ac, up USD 1/ac from 2025. The trend line below uses NASS state rows so it stays stable even when individual county suppression changes year to year.
From county average to parcel read
A county average tells you what surveyed non-irrigated cropland rented for in that county. It does not see whether your acres are high-PI prairie soil, a wet corner, a small irregular field, or ground with better access and drainage than the county average.
Scout reads the parcel's SSURGO soil profile, starts from the county NASS rent when it exists, and applies AgriTerra's PI-based soil band around that benchmark. If the county is unavailable, Scout uses the state figure and labels the downgrade.
Check the parcel, not just the county.
Start with the Georgia county benchmark, then let Scout read the parcel's soils, acreage, flood, wetlands, CRP fit, and energy context.