County cash rent
Minnesota Farmland Cash Rent: County Rates and Trends
USDA NASS reported 81 Minnesota county cash-rent figures for non-irrigated cropland in 2025. The 2026 state average is USD 205/ac, up USD 6/ac from 2025.
The five highest reported Minnesota counties in 2025 are Martin (USD 285/ac), Sibley (USD 278/ac), Freeborn (USD 276/ac), Dodge (USD 272/ac), Renville (USD 269/ac).
The five lowest reported counties are St. Louis (USD 11/ac), Hubbard (USD 16/ac), Aitkin (USD 18/ac), Carlton (USD 24/ac), Cass (USD 25/ac), which shows why a statewide average is a weak substitute for county data.
For broader state soil, parcel, energy, and CRP context, use the Minnesota farmland analysis hub. This page stays focused on rent queries.
| County or fallback | Year | $/acre | Data level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aitkin | 2025 | USD 18/ac | NASS county figure |
| Anoka | 2025 | USD 71/ac | NASS county figure |
| Becker | 2025 | USD 125/ac | NASS county figure |
| Beltrami | 2025 | USD 47/ac | NASS county figure |
| Benton | 2025 | USD 109/ac | NASS county figure |
| Big Stone | 2025 | USD 169/ac | NASS county figure |
| Blue Earth | 2025 | USD 266/ac | NASS county figure |
| Brown | 2025 | USD 227/ac | NASS county figure |
| Carlton | 2025 | USD 24/ac | NASS county figure |
| Carver | 2025 | USD 231/ac | NASS county figure |
| Cass | 2025 | USD 25/ac | NASS county figure |
| Chippewa | 2025 | USD 226/ac | NASS county figure |
| Chisago | 2025 | USD 83/ac | NASS county figure |
| Clay | 2025 | USD 170/ac | NASS county figure |
| Clearwater | 2025 | USD 46/ac | NASS county figure |
| Cottonwood | 2025 | USD 244/ac | NASS county figure |
| Crow Wing | 2025 | USD 44/ac | NASS county figure |
| Dakota | 2025 | USD 238/ac | NASS county figure |
| Dodge | 2025 | USD 272/ac | NASS county figure |
| Douglas | 2025 | USD 152/ac | NASS county figure |
| Faribault | 2025 | USD 264/ac | NASS county figure |
| Fillmore | 2025 | USD 231/ac | NASS county figure |
| Freeborn | 2025 | USD 276/ac | NASS county figure |
| Grant | 2025 | USD 202/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hennepin | 2025 | USD 145/ac | NASS county figure |
| Houston | 2025 | USD 220/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hubbard | 2025 | USD 16/ac | NASS county figure |
| Itasca | 2025 | USD 31/ac | NASS county figure |
| Jackson | 2025 | USD 239/ac | NASS county figure |
| Kanabec | 2025 | USD 63/ac | NASS county figure |
| Kandiyohi | 2025 | USD 250/ac | NASS county figure |
| Kittson | 2025 | USD 93/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lac Qui Parle | 2025 | USD 212/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lake Of The Woods | 2025 | USD 47/ac | NASS county figure |
| Le Sueur | 2025 | USD 254/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lincoln | 2025 | USD 220/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lyon | 2025 | USD 222/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mahnomen | 2025 | USD 143/ac | NASS county figure |
| Marshall | 2025 | USD 120/ac | NASS county figure |
| Martin | 2025 | USD 285/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mcleod | 2025 | USD 251/ac | NASS county figure |
| Meeker | 2025 | USD 212/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mille Lacs | 2025 | USD 92/ac | NASS county figure |
| Morrison | 2025 | USD 92/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mower | 2025 | USD 264/ac | NASS county figure |
| Murray | 2025 | USD 247/ac | NASS county figure |
| Nicollet | 2025 | USD 258/ac | NASS county figure |
| Nobles | 2025 | USD 252/ac | NASS county figure |
| Norman | 2025 | USD 152/ac | NASS county figure |
| Olmsted | 2025 | USD 240/ac | NASS county figure |
| Otter Tail | 2025 | USD 98/ac | NASS county figure |
| Pennington | 2025 | USD 87/ac | NASS county figure |
| Pine | 2025 | USD 51/ac | NASS county figure |
| Pipestone | 2025 | USD 213/ac | NASS county figure |
| Polk | 2025 | USD 137/ac | NASS county figure |
| Pope | 2025 | USD 155/ac | NASS county figure |
| Red Lake | 2025 | USD 88/ac | NASS county figure |
| Redwood | 2025 | USD 251/ac | NASS county figure |
| Renville | 2025 | USD 269/ac | NASS county figure |
| Rice | 2025 | USD 258/ac | NASS county figure |
| Rock | 2025 | USD 240/ac | NASS county figure |
| Roseau | 2025 | USD 65/ac | NASS county figure |
| Scott | 2025 | USD 209/ac | NASS county figure |
| Sherburne | 2025 | USD 55/ac | NASS county figure |
| Sibley | 2025 | USD 278/ac | NASS county figure |
| St. Louis | 2025 | USD 11/ac | NASS county figure |
| Stearns | 2025 | USD 186/ac | NASS county figure |
| Steele | 2025 | USD 258/ac | NASS county figure |
| Stevens | 2025 | USD 190/ac | NASS county figure |
| Swift | 2025 | USD 229/ac | NASS county figure |
| Todd | 2025 | USD 116/ac | NASS county figure |
| Traverse | 2025 | USD 202/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wabasha | 2025 | USD 233/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wadena | 2025 | USD 43/ac | NASS county figure |
| Waseca | 2025 | USD 260/ac | NASS county figure |
| Washington | 2025 | USD 153/ac | NASS county figure |
| Watonwan | 2025 | USD 259/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wilkin | 2025 | USD 151/ac | NASS county figure |
| Winona | 2025 | USD 246/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wright | 2025 | USD 175/ac | NASS county figure |
| Yellow Medicine | 2025 | USD 230/ac | NASS county figure |
| Counties not separately reported by NASS | 2026 | USD 205/ac | State-level fallback, not county-specific |
County averages, not medians. The final fallback row shows the Minnesota state figure explicitly labeled as state-level for counties NASS does not separately report.
Five-year Minnesota trend
The 2026 state average is USD 205/ac, up USD 6/ac from 2025. The trend line below uses NASS state rows so it stays stable even when individual county suppression changes year to year.
From county average to parcel read
A county average tells you what surveyed non-irrigated cropland rented for in that county. It does not see whether your acres are high-PI prairie soil, a wet corner, a small irregular field, or ground with better access and drainage than the county average.
Scout reads the parcel's SSURGO soil profile, starts from the county NASS rent when it exists, and applies AgriTerra's PI-based soil band around that benchmark. If the county is unavailable, Scout uses the state figure and labels the downgrade.
Check the parcel, not just the county.
Start with the Minnesota county benchmark, then let Scout read the parcel's soils, acreage, flood, wetlands, CRP fit, and energy context.