County cash rent
Michigan Farmland Cash Rent: County Rates and Trends
USDA NASS reported 73 Michigan county cash-rent figures for non-irrigated cropland in 2025. The 2026 state average is USD 148/ac, up USD 5/ac from 2025.
The five highest reported Michigan counties in 2025 are Huron (USD 237/ac), Sanilac (USD 204/ac), Gratiot (USD 199/ac), Ionia (USD 196/ac), Lenawee (USD 176/ac).
The five lowest reported counties are Luce (USD 11/ac), Chippewa (USD 14/ac), Mackinac (USD 16/ac), Emmet (USD 17/ac), Delta (USD 20/ac), which shows why a statewide average is a weak substitute for county data.
For broader state soil, parcel, energy, and CRP context, use the Michigan farmland analysis hub. This page stays focused on rent queries.
| County or fallback | Year | $/acre | Data level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcona | 2025 | USD 63/ac | NASS county figure |
| Alger | 2025 | USD 26/ac | NASS county figure |
| Allegan | 2025 | USD 143/ac | NASS county figure |
| Alpena | 2025 | USD 42/ac | NASS county figure |
| Antrim | 2025 | USD 42/ac | NASS county figure |
| Arenac | 2025 | USD 104/ac | NASS county figure |
| Barry | 2025 | USD 122/ac | NASS county figure |
| Bay | 2025 | USD 147/ac | NASS county figure |
| Berrien | 2025 | USD 152/ac | NASS county figure |
| Branch | 2025 | USD 150/ac | NASS county figure |
| Calhoun | 2025 | USD 164/ac | NASS county figure |
| Cass | 2025 | USD 120/ac | NASS county figure |
| Charlevoix | 2025 | USD 28/ac | NASS county figure |
| Cheboygan | 2025 | USD 27/ac | NASS county figure |
| Chippewa | 2025 | USD 14/ac | NASS county figure |
| Clare | 2025 | USD 101/ac | NASS county figure |
| Clinton | 2025 | USD 143/ac | NASS county figure |
| Delta | 2025 | USD 20/ac | NASS county figure |
| Dickinson | 2025 | USD 22/ac | NASS county figure |
| Eaton | 2025 | USD 138/ac | NASS county figure |
| Emmet | 2025 | USD 17/ac | NASS county figure |
| Genesee | 2025 | USD 130/ac | NASS county figure |
| Gladwin | 2025 | USD 102/ac | NASS county figure |
| Grand Traverse | 2025 | USD 48/ac | NASS county figure |
| Gratiot | 2025 | USD 199/ac | NASS county figure |
| Hillsdale | 2025 | USD 136/ac | NASS county figure |
| Huron | 2025 | USD 237/ac | NASS county figure |
| Ingham | 2025 | USD 164/ac | NASS county figure |
| Ionia | 2025 | USD 196/ac | NASS county figure |
| Iosco | 2025 | USD 87/ac | NASS county figure |
| Isabella | 2025 | USD 124/ac | NASS county figure |
| Jackson | 2025 | USD 104/ac | NASS county figure |
| Kalamazoo | 2025 | USD 134/ac | NASS county figure |
| Kalkaska | 2025 | USD 24/ac | NASS county figure |
| Kent | 2025 | USD 133/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lake | 2025 | USD 72/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lapeer | 2025 | USD 85/ac | NASS county figure |
| Leelanau | 2025 | USD 107/ac | NASS county figure |
| Lenawee | 2025 | USD 176/ac | NASS county figure |
| Livingston | 2025 | USD 96/ac | NASS county figure |
| Luce | 2025 | USD 11/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mackinac | 2025 | USD 16/ac | NASS county figure |
| Macomb | 2025 | USD 100/ac | NASS county figure |
| Manistee | 2025 | USD 39/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mason | 2025 | USD 62/ac | NASS county figure |
| Mecosta | 2025 | USD 63/ac | NASS county figure |
| Menominee | 2025 | USD 30/ac | NASS county figure |
| Midland | 2025 | USD 173/ac | NASS county figure |
| Missaukee | 2025 | USD 103/ac | NASS county figure |
| Monroe | 2025 | USD 164/ac | NASS county figure |
| Montcalm | 2025 | USD 89/ac | NASS county figure |
| Montmorency | 2025 | USD 32/ac | NASS county figure |
| Muskegon | 2025 | USD 93/ac | NASS county figure |
| Newaygo | 2025 | USD 92/ac | NASS county figure |
| Oakland | 2025 | USD 76/ac | NASS county figure |
| Oceana | 2025 | USD 93/ac | NASS county figure |
| Ogemaw | 2025 | USD 64/ac | NASS county figure |
| Ontonagon | 2025 | USD 22/ac | NASS county figure |
| Osceola | 2025 | USD 84/ac | NASS county figure |
| Oscoda | 2025 | USD 49/ac | NASS county figure |
| Otsego | 2025 | USD 25/ac | NASS county figure |
| Ottawa | 2025 | USD 129/ac | NASS county figure |
| Presque Isle | 2025 | USD 44/ac | NASS county figure |
| Saginaw | 2025 | USD 138/ac | NASS county figure |
| Sanilac | 2025 | USD 204/ac | NASS county figure |
| Shiawassee | 2025 | USD 139/ac | NASS county figure |
| St Clair | 2025 | USD 83/ac | NASS county figure |
| St Joseph | 2025 | USD 151/ac | NASS county figure |
| Tuscola | 2025 | USD 152/ac | NASS county figure |
| Van Buren | 2025 | USD 167/ac | NASS county figure |
| Washtenaw | 2025 | USD 94/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wayne | 2025 | USD 97/ac | NASS county figure |
| Wexford | 2025 | USD 37/ac | NASS county figure |
| Counties not separately reported by NASS | 2026 | USD 148/ac | State-level fallback, not county-specific |
County averages, not medians. The final fallback row shows the Michigan state figure explicitly labeled as state-level for counties NASS does not separately report.
Five-year Michigan trend
The 2026 state average is USD 148/ac, up USD 5/ac from 2025. The trend line below uses NASS state rows so it stays stable even when individual county suppression changes year to year.
From county average to parcel read
A county average tells you what surveyed non-irrigated cropland rented for in that county. It does not see whether your acres are high-PI prairie soil, a wet corner, a small irregular field, or ground with better access and drainage than the county average.
Scout reads the parcel's SSURGO soil profile, starts from the county NASS rent when it exists, and applies AgriTerra's PI-based soil band around that benchmark. If the county is unavailable, Scout uses the state figure and labels the downgrade.
Check the parcel, not just the county.
Start with the Michigan county benchmark, then let Scout read the parcel's soils, acreage, flood, wetlands, CRP fit, and energy context.