County cash rent

Kansas Farmland Cash Rent: County Rates and Trends

USDA NASS reported 103 Kansas county cash-rent figures for non-irrigated cropland in 2025. The 2026 state average is USD 67/ac, up USD 3/ac from 2025.

Check a Kansas parcel in Scout County table plus state-level fallback rule.

The five highest reported Kansas counties in 2025 are Doniphan (USD 202/ac), Brown (USD 197/ac), Atchison (USD 135/ac), Nemaha (USD 135/ac), Marshall (USD 115/ac).

The five lowest reported counties are Morton (USD 30/ac), Chautauqua (USD 31/ac), Stanton (USD 31/ac), Seward (USD 32/ac), Comanche (USD 33/ac), which shows why a statewide average is a weak substitute for county data.

For broader state soil, parcel, energy, and CRP context, use the Kansas farmland analysis hub. This page stays focused on rent queries.

Kansas cash rent by county (2025)
County or fallbackYear$/acreData level
Allen2025USD 64/acNASS county figure
Anderson2025USD 63/acNASS county figure
Atchison2025USD 135/acNASS county figure
Barber2025USD 43/acNASS county figure
Barton2025USD 45/acNASS county figure
Bourbon2025USD 58/acNASS county figure
Brown2025USD 197/acNASS county figure
Butler2025USD 56/acNASS county figure
Chase2025USD 70/acNASS county figure
Chautauqua2025USD 31/acNASS county figure
Cherokee2025USD 67/acNASS county figure
Cheyenne2025USD 54/acNASS county figure
Clark2025USD 37/acNASS county figure
Clay2025USD 96/acNASS county figure
Cloud2025USD 110/acNASS county figure
Coffey2025USD 70/acNASS county figure
Comanche2025USD 33/acNASS county figure
Cowley2025USD 50/acNASS county figure
Crawford2025USD 68/acNASS county figure
Decatur2025USD 56/acNASS county figure
Dickinson2025USD 67/acNASS county figure
Doniphan2025USD 202/acNASS county figure
Douglas2025USD 90/acNASS county figure
Edwards2025USD 41/acNASS county figure
Elk2025USD 52/acNASS county figure
Ellis2025USD 43/acNASS county figure
Ellsworth2025USD 50/acNASS county figure
Finney2025USD 42/acNASS county figure
Ford2025USD 43/acNASS county figure
Franklin2025USD 62/acNASS county figure
Geary2025USD 82/acNASS county figure
Gove2025USD 49/acNASS county figure
Graham2025USD 44/acNASS county figure
Gray2025USD 48/acNASS county figure
Greeley2025USD 41/acNASS county figure
Greenwood2025USD 55/acNASS county figure
Hamilton2025USD 33/acNASS county figure
Harper2025USD 40/acNASS county figure
Harvey2025USD 67/acNASS county figure
Haskell2025USD 41/acNASS county figure
Hodgeman2025USD 37/acNASS county figure
Jackson2025USD 103/acNASS county figure
Jefferson2025USD 72/acNASS county figure
Jewell2025USD 84/acNASS county figure
Johnson2025USD 78/acNASS county figure
Kearny2025USD 35/acNASS county figure
Kingman2025USD 46/acNASS county figure
Kiowa2025USD 34/acNASS county figure
Labette2025USD 53/acNASS county figure
Lane2025USD 41/acNASS county figure
Leavenworth2025USD 88/acNASS county figure
Lincoln2025USD 64/acNASS county figure
Linn2025USD 88/acNASS county figure
Logan2025USD 50/acNASS county figure
Lyon2025USD 66/acNASS county figure
Marion2025USD 59/acNASS county figure
Marshall2025USD 115/acNASS county figure
Mcpherson2025USD 67/acNASS county figure
Meade2025USD 43/acNASS county figure
Miami2025USD 77/acNASS county figure
Mitchell2025USD 80/acNASS county figure
Montgomery2025USD 63/acNASS county figure
Morris2025USD 58/acNASS county figure
Morton2025USD 30/acNASS county figure
Nemaha2025USD 135/acNASS county figure
Neosho2025USD 63/acNASS county figure
Ness2025USD 40/acNASS county figure
Norton2025USD 48/acNASS county figure
Osage2025USD 72/acNASS county figure
Osborne2025USD 59/acNASS county figure
Ottawa2025USD 70/acNASS county figure
Pawnee2025USD 44/acNASS county figure
Phillips2025USD 52/acNASS county figure
Pottawatomie2025USD 98/acNASS county figure
Pratt2025USD 42/acNASS county figure
Rawlins2025USD 64/acNASS county figure
Reno2025USD 55/acNASS county figure
Republic2025USD 97/acNASS county figure
Rice2025USD 59/acNASS county figure
Riley2025USD 75/acNASS county figure
Rooks2025USD 49/acNASS county figure
Rush2025USD 41/acNASS county figure
Russell2025USD 40/acNASS county figure
Saline2025USD 65/acNASS county figure
Scott2025USD 55/acNASS county figure
Sedgwick2025USD 56/acNASS county figure
Seward2025USD 32/acNASS county figure
Shawnee2025USD 65/acNASS county figure
Sheridan2025USD 63/acNASS county figure
Sherman2025USD 58/acNASS county figure
Smith2025USD 73/acNASS county figure
Stafford2025USD 52/acNASS county figure
Stanton2025USD 31/acNASS county figure
Stevens2025USD 37/acNASS county figure
Sumner2025USD 49/acNASS county figure
Thomas2025USD 58/acNASS county figure
Trego2025USD 46/acNASS county figure
Wabaunsee2025USD 62/acNASS county figure
Wallace2025USD 45/acNASS county figure
Washington2025USD 86/acNASS county figure
Wichita2025USD 56/acNASS county figure
Wilson2025USD 77/acNASS county figure
Woodson2025USD 49/acNASS county figure
Counties not separately reported by NASS2026USD 67/acState-level fallback, not county-specific

County averages, not medians. The final fallback row shows the Kansas state figure explicitly labeled as state-level for counties NASS does not separately report.

Source: USDA NASS QuickStats, Survey years 2022 to 2026. Retrieved August 2026. High confidence.

Five-year Kansas trend

The 2026 state average is USD 67/ac, up USD 3/ac from 2025. The trend line below uses NASS state rows so it stays stable even when individual county suppression changes year to year.

Kansas non-irrigated cropland cash rent A five-year line chart of dollars per acre. 70 60 2022 62 2023 63 2024 65 2025 64 2026 67
Dollars per acre per year. State rows are USDA NASS QuickStats records.

From county average to parcel read

A county average tells you what surveyed non-irrigated cropland rented for in that county. It does not see whether your acres are high-PI prairie soil, a wet corner, a small irregular field, or ground with better access and drainage than the county average.

Scout reads the parcel's SSURGO soil profile, starts from the county NASS rent when it exists, and applies AgriTerra's PI-based soil band around that benchmark. If the county is unavailable, Scout uses the state figure and labels the downgrade.

Check the parcel, not just the county.

Start with the Kansas county benchmark, then let Scout read the parcel's soils, acreage, flood, wetlands, CRP fit, and energy context.

Analyze Kansas farmland free